Ignite Creation Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:43 PM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 3:43 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06655571
Status:
RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
None
First Post:
2024-10-21
Brief Title:
What Technique for Caudal Block in Children Conventional or Ultrasound-guided
Sponsor:
None
Organization:
None
Study Overview
Official Title:
What Technique for Caudal Block in Children Conventional or Ultrasound-guided
Status:
RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-10
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
No
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The goal of our study is to compare ultrasound-guided caudal block to the conventional technique based on anatomical landmarks
Detailed Description:
The primary endpoint was the success rate of each technique We also collected the time taken for each technique the number of punctures and the incidence of complications subcutaneous infiltration intravascular injection
Children were randomized to receive a caudal block based on anatomical landmarks group C or ultrasound-guided group E at a dose of 1 mlkg of 025 bupivacaine not exceeding 20 ml
Children were randomized to receive a caudal block based on anatomical landmarks group C or ultrasound-guided group E at a dose of 1 mlkg of 025 bupivacaine not exceeding 20 ml
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None