Viewing Study NCT01812304


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 7:58 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-27 @ 5:08 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT01812304
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2022-07-08
First Post: 2013-03-08
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Theoretical Compared With hands-on Training of Vaginal Breech Management
Sponsor: Ruhr University of Bochum
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills Evaluation of Theoretical Compared With hands-on Training of Shoulder Dystocia Management: a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2022-07
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: This trial aims to assess the hypothesis that hands-on training of vaginal breech delivery on a pelvic model is significantly better in terms of a technical skills scoring system compared to frontal teaching.
Detailed Description: Primary endpoint is a score describing technical proficiency, ie the OSATS score, consisting of 25 items. Each item, if done correctly, is awarded one point. The maximum OSATS score is 25.

Secondary endpoints are performance time in seconds, cinfidence using a scale from 1-5 with one being very confident and 5 having no confidence when performing the procedures, and self-assessment using a scale of 1-5 with 1 being the optimal grade.

This is a two-arm study. The experimental arm uses a hands-on training and the control arm a frontal teaching approach. The allocation is randomized and single-blinded.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: None
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: