Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 8:03 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-05 @ 6:31 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT02572804
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2016-11-02
First Post:
2015-10-06
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Comparing Rectus Sheath Catheter to Epidural Post Cystectomy
Sponsor:
Vancouver Coastal Health
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
A Randomised Controlled Trial of Thoracic Epidural Analgesia Versus Surgically Placed Rectus Sheath Catheters for Open Radical Cystectomy: Is There a Difference in Patient Outcomes?
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2016-10
Last Known Status:
RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
This is a prospective randomised controlled trial that will compare the outcomes of rectus sheath catheters to epidurals in patients who have undergone a cystectomy, via a lower midline abdominal incision for bladder cancer.
Detailed Description:
This study will compare the outcomes of two different pain control techniques, used as standard of care, following major abdominal surgery for bladder removal. Rectus sheath catheters are small tubes that are positioned into a specific area of the cut abdominal wall at the end of surgery; whereas an epidural is a tube that is positioned into the back. Both allow administration of local anaesthetic for pain control. The current gold standard is an epidural. This study will aim to evaluate this and show the comparative efficacy of the rectus sheath catheter, which anecdotally the investigators have found superior in practice.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
Secondary ID Infos
| Secondary ID | Type | Domain | Link | View |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1502041 | OTHER | UBC CREB Number | View |