Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 9:10 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 7:00 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT05796804
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2024-07-30
First Post:
2023-03-21
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Erector Spinae Block Versus PENG Block for Hip Replacement
Sponsor:
Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Erector Spinae Block Versus PENG Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Total Hip Replacement
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2024-07
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
PENGESP
Brief Summary:
THR (Total Hip Replacement) can be very painful and regional anesthesia is very effective in reducing postoperative pain. Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) and PENG (pericapsular nerve group block) are alternative approaches to the hip sensitive nerve branches that resulted to be very promising for hip surgeries. However, no studies investigated the analgesic superiority of either PENG or ESPB. In our study the investigators compare PENG (with a lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block) and ESPB in terms of pain relief expressed as morphine consumption in the first 24 hours after primary THR.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: