Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 9:22 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-05 @ 1:34 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT02763332
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2016-06-28
First Post:
2016-05-03
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Effect of the Kinesio Taping in Fibromyalgia.
Sponsor:
University of Valencia
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Effect of the Kinesio Taping in Patients With Fibromyalgia.
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2016-06
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
EffKtFbm
Brief Summary:
The prevalence of the fibromyalgia is about 10-15% in the European countries. It is unclear the etiology and pathogenesis of the syndrome. Several factors such as dysfunction of the central and autonomic nervous systems, neurotransmitters, hormones, immune system, external stressors, psychiatric aspects, and others seem to be involved. But the symptom commonly expressed by the people who suffer from it is pain.
The main goal of the present study is to analyse the effect of the kinesiotaping on the pain, comfort and postural position of the patient with fibromyalgia.
The main goal of the present study is to analyse the effect of the kinesiotaping on the pain, comfort and postural position of the patient with fibromyalgia.
Detailed Description:
All of the participants were recruited, in a non-probabilistic way, from the Valencian Association of Affected of Fibromyalgia from date to april 2016. Inclusion criteria include: age between 18 and 70 years old and diagnosis of fibromyalgia based on the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) diagnostic criteria. Once they expressed their interest in taking part of the study, potential participants underwent an examination by a rheumatologist of the association to confirm the diagnosis of fibromyalgia. People with other different diagnosis, musculoskeletal or neurological disorders that prevented the follow-up study, infections, whiplash, migraine, skin hypersensitivity or heart devices were excluded.
The participants were randomly allocated (random numbers table) to two different groups depending on the placement of the Kinesio Tape © (KT) by a physiotherapist which did not participated in the study. Thus, one group was composed by 18 women and was called "Upper trunk group" (UTG). The other group, composed by 17 women and called "Global trunk group" (GTG).
Patients were informed about the purpose of the study, procedures and risks, and they provided written informed consent before the treatment. The study protocol was approved by the authors´ University Ethic Committee where the study was conducted. All procedures were conducted in accordance to the Declaration of Helsinki.
A prospective, randomized, double blind, controlled trial was carried out. Participants were assessed two times, one before the intervention and another afterwards. They received a treatment of kinesiotaping during three weeks. Participants came to our laboratory each week in order to change their bandage and assure the adherence to the treatment.
The physiotherapist who conducted the assessments was blinded to the treatment received by the patients and the statistician was completely blinded to the goals of the study. The physiotherapist who applied the treatment had an extensive experience Kinesio Tape ©.
All enrolled participants were aware that they could receive two types of treatments but did not know the purposes of each treatment. They were instructed to not change their daily routines.
The participants were randomly allocated (random numbers table) to two different groups depending on the placement of the Kinesio Tape © (KT) by a physiotherapist which did not participated in the study. Thus, one group was composed by 18 women and was called "Upper trunk group" (UTG). The other group, composed by 17 women and called "Global trunk group" (GTG).
Patients were informed about the purpose of the study, procedures and risks, and they provided written informed consent before the treatment. The study protocol was approved by the authors´ University Ethic Committee where the study was conducted. All procedures were conducted in accordance to the Declaration of Helsinki.
A prospective, randomized, double blind, controlled trial was carried out. Participants were assessed two times, one before the intervention and another afterwards. They received a treatment of kinesiotaping during three weeks. Participants came to our laboratory each week in order to change their bandage and assure the adherence to the treatment.
The physiotherapist who conducted the assessments was blinded to the treatment received by the patients and the statistician was completely blinded to the goals of the study. The physiotherapist who applied the treatment had an extensive experience Kinesio Tape ©.
All enrolled participants were aware that they could receive two types of treatments but did not know the purposes of each treatment. They were instructed to not change their daily routines.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: