Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 9:23 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-28 @ 12:28 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT02395432
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2016-10-12
First Post:
2015-03-09
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
A Comparison of Tracheal Intubation Using the Totaltrack vs the Macintosh Laryngoscope in Difficult Airway
Sponsor:
Manuel Ángel Gómez-Ríos
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
A Comparison of Tracheal Intubation Using the Totaltrack vs the Macintosh Laryngoscope in Difficult Airway: a Randomised, Controlled Clinical Trial
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2016-10
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Endotracheal intubation is usually required to allow unrestricted surgical approach. The Macintosh laryngoscope is the standard method. However in certain situations as difficult airway this technique is ineffective and poorly tolerated by the patient. Fiberoptic intubation is the gold standard in this scenario, however sometimes it is not possible due to failure or unavailability, so alternatives are needed. The TotalTrack (MedComflow SA, Barcelona, Spain) has been designed specifically for the airway management. However, despite its use in clinical practice, there are no comparative studies regarding direct laryngoscopy.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: