Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 9:24 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-02 @ 7:59 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT02190032
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2015-02-24
First Post:
2014-07-06
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Modified Angled Tube vs. Conventional Angled Tube in Double-lumen Endotracheal Tube Intubation
Sponsor:
Samsung Medical Center
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparison of Individually Modified Angled Tube and Conventional Angled Tube in Double-lumen Endotracheal Tube Intubation: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2015-02
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The investigators are trying to compare the individually modified-angled tube and the conventional-angled tube in ease of double lumen endotracheal tube insertion and the incidence of related postoperative complications.
Detailed Description:
Inserting a double lumen endotracheal tube is somewhat more difficult than a single lumen tube intubation because of its larger outer diameter and the more rigid feature. Moreover, the airway axes (oral-,pharyngeal-, and laryngotracheal axis) are not always straight under sniffing condition. Therefore, to make easy to insert a double-lumen tube and reduce the tube-related complications, we are trying to compare the individually angle-modified tube and the manufacturer-provided-angled tube.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: