Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 9:32 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-02-13 @ 3:52 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT02587832
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2015-10-27
First Post:
2015-10-20
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
High Flow Nasal Cannula in Comparison With Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in the Management of Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Sponsor:
Sidra Medicine
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Randomized Control Trial: Heated Humidity High Flow Nasal Cannula in Comparison With Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in the Management of Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Extreme Low Birth Infants in Immediate Post Extubation Period
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2015-10
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
To compare the primary outcome, failure of extubation defined by the need for re-intubation and mechanical ventilation within 5 days of initial extubation and secondary outcomes, morbidities and mortality after using of heated humidity high flow nasal cannula (HHHFNC) and Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (NCPAP) in the immediate post-extubation period for preterm infants between 24 and 28 weeks gestation with respiratory distress syndrome.
Detailed Description:
Inclusion criteria were: 1) Preterm neonates with gestational age of 24 to 28 completed weeks. 2) In the case of twins, both neonates were included in the same treatment arm. 3) Success to wean with 24 hours to extubate. 4) Parental written informed consent for participation in the study obtained on admission into the hospital or prior to delivery.
Exclusion criteria were: 1) Evidence of severe birth asphyxia. 2) Known genetic or chromosomal disorders. 3) Infants delivered to mothers with ruptured membranes of more than three weeks duration. 4) Potentially life-threatening conditions unrelated to prematurity. 5) Participation in another clinical trial of any placebo, drug, biological, or device conducted under the provisions of a protocol.
Randomization A computer-generated block-randomization sequence with random block sizes was used. Infants who were part of multiple births underwent individual randomization. Clinicians opened consecutively numbered, sealed, brown envelopes immediately before extubation to determine the study-group assignment.
Exclusion criteria were: 1) Evidence of severe birth asphyxia. 2) Known genetic or chromosomal disorders. 3) Infants delivered to mothers with ruptured membranes of more than three weeks duration. 4) Potentially life-threatening conditions unrelated to prematurity. 5) Participation in another clinical trial of any placebo, drug, biological, or device conducted under the provisions of a protocol.
Randomization A computer-generated block-randomization sequence with random block sizes was used. Infants who were part of multiple births underwent individual randomization. Clinicians opened consecutively numbered, sealed, brown envelopes immediately before extubation to determine the study-group assignment.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: