Viewing Study NCT04104932


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 9:34 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2026-01-21 @ 1:33 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT04104932
Status: UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted: 2019-09-26
First Post: 2019-06-28
Is Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Surgical and Conservative Treatment in Isolated Minor Rib Fractures
Sponsor: Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho Hospital
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Comparison of the Outcomes of Surgical Stabilization and Conservative Treatment in Patients With Isolated Minor Rib Fractures: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study.
Status: UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date: 2019-09
Last Known Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: The purpose of this research is to compare the outcomes of surgical stabilization and conservative treatment in patients with isolated minor rib fractures.
Detailed Description: Isolated minor rib fractures (IMRFs), which is defined by single or two isolated minor rib fractures caused by trauma or stress. Traditionally, rib fractures are managed mainly by surgical stabilization or conservative treatment. In 2018, a systemic review and meta-analysis for patients with multiple rib fractures had revealed a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation, shorter hospital length of stay, and fewer trauma-associated complications in the surgical group than in the non-surgical group. In contrast, IMRFs are seldom life threatening, and compared to extremity fractures, rib fractures do not require matching accurately. Thus, IMRFs are usually treated conservatively. However, the investigators have clinically observed that patients suffering severe pain due to progressive rib displacement may take longer to return to normal activity, have lower quality of life, and even an increased risk of complications. Moreover, limited studies discussed the efficacy of surgical interventions for IMRFs. Therefore, the investigators conduct a prospective observational cohort study to compare the outcomes of surgical stabilization and conservative treatment in patients with IMRFs. The investigators collect patients with IMRFs whose situation were both suitable for surgical and non-surgical interventions. After explanation, patients can decide to undergo conservative or surgical treatment by themselves. The investigators will follow up pain scores, chest X-ray, pulmonary function tests, and duration of return to normal activity. Those data will be statistically analyzed by two-tailed two-sample t-test. This prospective cohort study is supposed to provide more evidence for clinical decision making and optimal management of IMRFs.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: