Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 9:42 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-30 @ 3:55 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT02266732
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2015-02-23
First Post:
2014-10-03
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Ultrasound Vs Nerve Stimulation - Why is a PNS so Effective?
Sponsor:
The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Ultrasound Vs Nerve Stimulation - Why is a PNS so Effective?
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2015-02
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The traditional model of localizing a nerve for blockade is using a peripheral nerve stimulator, PNS. Recent advances in UltraSound technology has allowed UltraSound to guide nerve blockade. However despite excellent visualization nerve block success has not significantly improved. I aim to show that this is because the PNS stimulation of a nerve is more than a proximity response as thought but a correct fascial plane response and hence the high success rate of this blind approach.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
Is an Unapproved Device?:
Is a PPSD?:
Is a US Export?:
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
Secondary ID Infos
| Secondary ID | Type | Domain | Link | View |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/YH/0206 | OTHER | Research Ethics Committee | View |