Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 9:43 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-02 @ 11:44 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT01767532
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2017-06-22
First Post:
2013-01-10
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Bioequivalence Study of Cephalexin Suspension 125
Sponsor:
GlaxoSmithKline
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Open, Two Periods, Two Treatments, Two Sequences, Cross-over, Randomized Study With Single Dosage of Two Oral Preparation of Cephalexin 125 mg/ 5 ml (Ceporex® GlaxoSmithKline México, S.A. de C.V. vs. Keflex®, Eli Lilly y Compañía de México, S.A. de C.V.) in Fasting Healthy Volunteers
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2017-06
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The objective of this study was to confirm if two formulations of cephalexin suspension are bioequivalent.
Test product was Ceporex® (125 mg Cephalexin / 5 ml; GlaxoSmithKline) and reference product Keflex® (125 mg Cephalexin / 5 ml; Eli Lilly). The single dosage was 20 ml of suspension.
The study was prospective, open-label, randomized, crossover, single dose, with 02 treatments, 02 sequences and 02 periods, under fasting conditions.
The population was composed of 28 healthy volunteers, both genders, adults between 18-50 years.
The comparative bioavailability of the two formulations was evaluated based in statistical comparisons of relevant pharmacokinetic parameters, obtained from data of drug concentrations in blood.
Test product was Ceporex® (125 mg Cephalexin / 5 ml; GlaxoSmithKline) and reference product Keflex® (125 mg Cephalexin / 5 ml; Eli Lilly). The single dosage was 20 ml of suspension.
The study was prospective, open-label, randomized, crossover, single dose, with 02 treatments, 02 sequences and 02 periods, under fasting conditions.
The population was composed of 28 healthy volunteers, both genders, adults between 18-50 years.
The comparative bioavailability of the two formulations was evaluated based in statistical comparisons of relevant pharmacokinetic parameters, obtained from data of drug concentrations in blood.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
Is an Unapproved Device?:
Is a PPSD?:
Is a US Export?:
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: