Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 9:46 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-28 @ 2:24 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT00981032
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2011-02-17
First Post:
2009-09-11
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Improving Aspirin Use Among Adults at Risk for Cardiovascular Disease (CVD)
Sponsor:
Geisinger Clinic
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Improving Implementation of the US Preventive Service Task Force Recommendation for Prophylactic Aspirin Use Among Adults at Risk for Cardiovascular Disease
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2011-02
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The investigators' aim is to implement an intervention to increase aspirin prophylaxis use among patients that is patient initiated, optimizes use of physician and staff time, appropriately compensates staff, provides clinicians with tools necessary for managing aspiring prophylaxis, and ensures continuous management.
Detailed Description:
This intervention addresses a fundamental question of how clinicians need to be directly involved in motivating behavior change (i.e., aspirin prophylaxis). While complex behavior change likely demands high levels of involvement, a single simple action (aspirin prophylaxis) may not require such complex interactions.
We propose to compare the effectiveness of three models of care in a rigorous randomized controlled trial that will consist of a 3-arm, within-clinic design in which patients will be randomized to either the physician-initiated, the patient-initiated model, or to a control group in which usual care is delivered. In a patient-initiated model, patients are active participants in their own care and receive a pre-visit summary that contains an individualized risk assessment and patient education. In the physician-initiated model, patients receive the pre-visit summary and the physician uses a clinical decision support tool through the electronic health record that details the patient risk of CVD.
The specific aims of the proposed work are to compare the reliability and overall effectiveness of two different methods for motivating patients to take aspirin to prevent stroke and heart attacks as well as to develop a plan for translating the intervention into a process that is suitable for a paper-based clinic.
We propose to compare the effectiveness of three models of care in a rigorous randomized controlled trial that will consist of a 3-arm, within-clinic design in which patients will be randomized to either the physician-initiated, the patient-initiated model, or to a control group in which usual care is delivered. In a patient-initiated model, patients are active participants in their own care and receive a pre-visit summary that contains an individualized risk assessment and patient education. In the physician-initiated model, patients receive the pre-visit summary and the physician uses a clinical decision support tool through the electronic health record that details the patient risk of CVD.
The specific aims of the proposed work are to compare the reliability and overall effectiveness of two different methods for motivating patients to take aspirin to prevent stroke and heart attacks as well as to develop a plan for translating the intervention into a process that is suitable for a paper-based clinic.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: