Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 10:01 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 7:38 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06829732
Status:
RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2025-02-17
First Post:
2024-01-15
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Closed Loop Oxygen Control in INtubated Critically Ill Patients
Sponsor:
Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Closed Loop Oxygen Control in INtubated Critically Ill Patients - CLOC-IN
Status:
RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2025-01
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
CLOC-IN
Brief Summary:
The deleterious effects of alveolar hyperoxia and (severe) hyperoxaemia are well described. Achieving safe and efficient oxygenation may be challenging. The hypothesis of the present study is that closed-loop oxygen control in intubated and mechanically ventilated critically ill patients improves oxygen administration compared with standard manual oxygen titrations. A single-blind, randomised crossover clinical trial assessing the efficacy and safety of the use of a closed-loop oxygen control versus manual oxygen titration in patients receiving mechanical ventilation has been designed. Patients will be randomised to receive first either closed-loop oxygen control (CLOC) or manual oxygen titration (MOT). The percentage of time spent in optimal and sub-optimal SpO2 (oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry) ranges will be calculated for each period.
Detailed Description:
The deleterious effects of alveolar hyperoxia and (severe) hyperoxaemia are well described. A safe and efficient oxygenation should be achieved. However, from a practical point of view, this may require frequent manual adjustments of the inspired oxygen, which might be unfeasible, especially in high-demand periods. Several automatic oxygen systems have been tested in non-intubated patients. The hypothesis of the present study is that closed-loop oxygen control in intubated and mechanically ventilated critically ill patients improves oxygen administration compared with standard manual oxygen titrations. Thus, the objective of the study is to compare the percentage of time spent in a predefined optimal SpO2 range between closed-loop oxygen control and manual oxygen titration.
A single-blind, randomised crossover clinical trial assessing the efficacy and safety of the use of a closed-loop oxygen control versus manual oxygen titration in patients receiving mechanical ventilation has been designed. Once included, patients will be randomised to receive first either closed-loop oxygen control (CLOC) or manual oxygen titration (MOT). Every period will last for 4h. Clinical and respiratory variables will be recorded. A memory box will be connected to the patient's ventilator. This device will record ventilator parameters, including FiO2 and SpO2. To assess the outcome, the percentage of time spent in optimal and sub-optimal SpO2 ranges will be calculated for each period.
A single-blind, randomised crossover clinical trial assessing the efficacy and safety of the use of a closed-loop oxygen control versus manual oxygen titration in patients receiving mechanical ventilation has been designed. Once included, patients will be randomised to receive first either closed-loop oxygen control (CLOC) or manual oxygen titration (MOT). Every period will last for 4h. Clinical and respiratory variables will be recorded. A memory box will be connected to the patient's ventilator. This device will record ventilator parameters, including FiO2 and SpO2. To assess the outcome, the percentage of time spent in optimal and sub-optimal SpO2 ranges will be calculated for each period.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: