Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 10:14 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-02 @ 2:58 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT03178435
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2019-02-26
First Post:
2017-06-04
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Preventing Acute Kidney Injury and Improving Outcome in Critically Ill Patients Utilising Risk Prediction Score
Sponsor:
Kasr El Aini Hospital
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Preventing Acute Kidney Injury and Improving Outcome in Critically Ill Patients Utilising Risk Prediction Score - a Pilot Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2019-02
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
PRAIOC-RISKS
Brief Summary:
An interventional controlled trial to test the feasibility of applying risk score based prevention for critically ill patient at high risk to develop acute kidney injury (AKI)
Detailed Description:
Background and rationale AKI is common in the intensive care unit .It contributes significantly to mortality and morbidity .the estimated incidence or AKI among critically ill patients is 30-40% and morality is high.
There is a well recognized gap between the optimal care and the delivered care regarding prevention and management of AKI.
The focus over the last few years has been on early detection. A panel of urinary biomarkers have proved helpful for early detection of AKI. However the cost and low specificity make no single one of them solely reliable .using a panel of bio-markers increases their specificity.
The concept of electronic alerts has been recently introduced. Some trials have been testing its impact on the outcome of AKI. The benefit of electronic alerts is still uncertain .A meta-analysis is currently underway to synthesize stronger evidence of electronic alerts benefit.
Another evolving area, is the development of risk score to predict AKI and and hence applying timely preventive measures.
KDIGO recommends applying preventive measures to high risk patients. However no study to date has tested risk scores based interventions
Hypothesis:
We will use the recently validated score to predict AKI in ICU patients. We will then apply preventive measures. To patients at risk .To our knowledge this is the first study to apply preventive interventions based on AKI risk score assessment
There is a well recognized gap between the optimal care and the delivered care regarding prevention and management of AKI.
The focus over the last few years has been on early detection. A panel of urinary biomarkers have proved helpful for early detection of AKI. However the cost and low specificity make no single one of them solely reliable .using a panel of bio-markers increases their specificity.
The concept of electronic alerts has been recently introduced. Some trials have been testing its impact on the outcome of AKI. The benefit of electronic alerts is still uncertain .A meta-analysis is currently underway to synthesize stronger evidence of electronic alerts benefit.
Another evolving area, is the development of risk score to predict AKI and and hence applying timely preventive measures.
KDIGO recommends applying preventive measures to high risk patients. However no study to date has tested risk scores based interventions
Hypothesis:
We will use the recently validated score to predict AKI in ICU patients. We will then apply preventive measures. To patients at risk .To our knowledge this is the first study to apply preventive interventions based on AKI risk score assessment
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: