Viewing Study NCT04175535


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 10:20 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2026-01-06 @ 4:01 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT04175535
Status: UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted: 2020-12-29
First Post: 2019-10-17
Is Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: The Comparative Study of Full-Endoscopic Cervical Posterior Discectomy and Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion
Sponsor: Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: The Comparative Study of Full-Endoscopic Cervical Posterior Discectomy and Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion for the Operation of Soft Cervical Disc Herniation.
Status: UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date: 2020-12
Last Known Status: RECRUITING
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: PPECD
Brief Summary: Anterior cervical decompression and fusion is the standard procedure for operation of cervical disc herniations. Mobility-preserving Full-Endoscopic Cervical Posterior discectomy is the most common alternative in the case of soft localization of the pathology. Endoscopic techniques are considered standard in many areas, since they may offer advantages in surgical technique and rehabilitation. These days, all disc herniations can be operated in full-endoscopic technique. With the full-endoscopic posterior cervical discectomy a procedures is available for cervical disc operations.
Detailed Description: Investigators conducted a differential, randomized, 1:1, double-blind clinical control trial to compare the clinical effect, safety and feasibility of Full-Endoscopic Cervical Posterior discectomy and Anterior cervical decompression and fusion. The study was conducted in three centers at the same time, including the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University Medical College, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital and Ningbo University Medical College Affiliated Hospital. This study is expected to include 308 patients with single level soft cervical disc herniation.Participants were randomly assigned to different groups for corresponding surgical intervention after complete preoperative evaluation.Participants received a standard 5-year follow-up procedure

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: