Viewing Study NCT03342235


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 10:21 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2026-01-01 @ 6:43 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT03342235
Status: WITHDRAWN
Last Update Posted: 2020-05-20
First Post: 2017-10-27
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Excimer Laser Surgery for Anisometropic Amblyopia
Sponsor: Jaeb Center for Health Research
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Excimer Laser Surgery for Anisometropic Amblyopia
Status: WITHDRAWN
Status Verified Date: 2020-05
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Study not started due to lack of recruitment potential.
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: ATS19
Brief Summary: Study Objectives To compare the efficacy and safety of surgical treatment (PRK) versus non-surgical treatment of anisometropic amblyopia in children who have failed conventional treatment due to non-compliance or non-response.

Synopsis of Study Design

The study consists of two phases:

1. A Patching Run-In Phase during which all participants are treated for at least 8 weeks with continued refractive correction (with spectacles and/or contact lenses) and patching prescribed 42 hours per week (averaging 6 hours daily) until no further improvement over 2 consecutive visits at least 4 weeks apart or the vision no longer meets eligibility criteria.
2. A Randomized Trial Phase, beginning after no further VA improvement in the patching run-in phase and qualifying amblyopia is still present, during which the participant is assigned to either surgery with PRK and patching prescribed 2 hours per day or to non-surgical treatment with continued refractive correction (with spectacles and/or contact lenses) and patching prescribed 2 hours per day.
Detailed Description: The study is evaluating the efficacy of surgical treatment with PRK versus non-surgical treatment of anisometropic amblyopia in children who have failed conventional treatment. The primary analysis will be a treatment group comparison of the change in BCVA in the amblyopic eye at the 8-month primary outcome visit. For participants wearing a contact lens, the BCVA will be the visual acuity tested in the contact lens rather than in spectacles (or trial frames).

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: True
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:

Secondary ID Infos

Secondary ID Type Domain Link View
2U10EY011751 NIH None https://reporter.nih.gov/quic… View