Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 10:37 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-01 @ 7:37 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT01961635
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2017-05-02
First Post:
2013-10-06
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Healing of Bone/Soft Tissue to Different Abutment Biomaterials and the Impact on Marginal Bone Loss
Sponsor:
Implantology Institute
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Healing Response if Peri-implant Tissues to Different Abutment Materials - Double-blinded Randomized Clinical Trial
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2017-04
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
In patients that require a dental implant, does zirconia compared to titanium, or cad-cam acrylic abutments, provide less inflammation, marginal bone loss or infection during the osseointegration period ?
Detailed Description:
Place dental Implants and zirconia, titanium, acrylic or cad-cam acrylic abutments, torque to 20 n/cm2 Evaluate Changes in inflammatory levels from T0 (baseline) to T7-12 weeks (measure intermediate points at T0 (baseline),,T1-8 Weeks and T2-12 weeks) Also evaluate outcomes marginal bone loss, gingival height levels and osseointegration
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: