Viewing Study NCT05105269


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 10:47 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-24 @ 10:47 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT05105269
Status: UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted: 2023-03-24
First Post: 2021-10-22
Is NOT Gene Therapy: False
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Managing Achilles Pain II
Sponsor: University of Essex
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Do Working Alliance, Patient Outcome Expectations and Self-efficacy Predict Change in Pain and Disability From Treatment With a Physiotherapist for Achilles Tendinopathy
Status: UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date: 2023-03
Last Known Status: RECRUITING
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: MAP II
Brief Summary: Although some people are more at risk than others, developing a painful Achilles tendon (known as Achilles tendinopathy) can affect anyone. It is a common and disabling condition affecting walking, running and work. To reduce the pain and disability, exercise is a commonly used treatment by physiotherapists. However, success varies. This is why the proposed research is needed, to identify the factors that predict changes in pain and disability from treatment with a physiotherapist. The investigators' previous research suggests the working relationship or 'alliance' between the physiotherapist and patient, the patient's expectations, and the patient's confidence to carry out exercise might be important, but further research is needed to determine this.

The investigators have designed a multi-centre, longitudinal cohort study to assess whether working alliance, patient expectations of treatment success, and confidence to perform exercise (self-efficacy) predict changes in pain and disability from a treatment programme prescribed by a physiotherapist for Achilles tendinopathy at twelve weeks. Patients, diagnosed with Achilles tendinopathy by their treating physiotherapist, will be introduced to the study through a verbal discussion and provided with details of the study's website (www.managing-achilles-pain.com). The website provides password protected information (the participant information sheet, consent form and a questionnaire measuring clinical outcomes and the predictive factors). The participant is asked to complete the questionnaire on three occasions; baseline, six weeks later and twelve weeks after baseline.
Detailed Description: Pain related to a tendon, termed tendinopathy, can be traumatic or insidious in onset and short-lasting or persistent in nature. Tendinopathy is common musculoskeletal condition; the incidence of tendinopathy is higher than osteoarthritis, for example. Achilles tendinopathy (AT) affects both active and sedentary individuals and can be characterised by reduced activity tolerance to specific tasks that load the tendon. This results in decreased activity participation such as walking, running and working.

Current clinical guidelines recommend exercise as the first line treatment for people with Achilles tendinopathy. However, the rate and extent of improvement in pain and disability varies. This variation suggests the investigators need to understand what factors predict change so the investigators can enhance care provided. Previously it was suggested that exercise worked by improving the strength or structure of the tendon, but it has been reported that pain and disability can change without corresponding changes in strength or structure. This suggests that other factors might be important predictors.

Recent literature suggests cognitive and contextual influences such as self-efficacy, working alliance and expectations may be important factors for predicting change in pain and disability in tendinopathy and need investigation. Based on this need, high-quality research is warranted. To inform the development of this research, two recent studies have been undertaken. Firstly, a feasibility study was completed. This study aimed to understand if it was feasible to collect data using a secure website to explore the association and predictive relationship of working alliance, outcome expectations and self-efficacy with pain and disability in the management of AT. The second study was a process evaluation to gain insight into the procedures undertaken in the feasibility study. Seven patients were interviewed to discover what worked (and did not) from their perspective during the study. Based on the results from the feasibility study and the information from the interviews with patients, using this website is feasible, but the investigators have made some changes before proposing this larger study. These changes include better promotion of the study, how verbal recruitment strategies could be improved, and how communication between clinicians and researchers could be made better. Based upon this knowledge this proposal aims to understand if working alliance, patient outcome expectations and self-efficacy predict response to treatment for AT.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: