Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 10:56 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-01 @ 9:21 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT00193869
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2007-05-10
First Post:
2005-09-11
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
SuperDEX Trial (Comparison of Two Doses of Dexamethasone for Malignant Spinal Cord Compression Treated by Radiotherapy).
Sponsor:
Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
A Pilot Randomised Comparison of Dexamethasone 96 mg Versus 16 mg Per Day for Malignant Spinal Cord Compression Treated by Radiotherapy
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2007-05
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The study aimed to pilot the viability of a full scale randomised comparison of 2 steroid doses in malignant spinal cord compression, to establish safety of high dose dexamethasone in this setting in Australia, to test web registration and randomisation and to compare different functional outcome measures.
Detailed Description:
Malignant spinal cord compression (MSCC) is an uncommon condition with an estimated annual incidence of 2.5 per 100,000. It is a dreaded complication of malignancy because of the severe impact paralysis and sphincter disturbance has on quality and duration of survival.
Rat models have demonstrated the effectiveness of high doses of steroids. Only three randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have been published. The first compared radiotherapy to laminectomy plus radiotherapy in a series of 29 patients and failed to show any significant differences The widespread commonly used dose of Dexamethasone in Australia at that time was 16 mg/24 hr and the main concern for implementing higher doses was the toxicity profile reported in the few small randomised comparisons available at the time.In view of the conflict between standard Australian practice versus published (overseas) guidelines, a randomised comparison was proposed in Australia. This study was a pilot study initiated to determine the viability of a large trial, to pilot the use of web technology for trial conduct and to determine clinically useful outcome measures apart from simple ambulation rates.
Comparisons: Patients randomised to receive either 16mg/24hr or 96mg/24hr dexamethasone.
Rat models have demonstrated the effectiveness of high doses of steroids. Only three randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have been published. The first compared radiotherapy to laminectomy plus radiotherapy in a series of 29 patients and failed to show any significant differences The widespread commonly used dose of Dexamethasone in Australia at that time was 16 mg/24 hr and the main concern for implementing higher doses was the toxicity profile reported in the few small randomised comparisons available at the time.In view of the conflict between standard Australian practice versus published (overseas) guidelines, a randomised comparison was proposed in Australia. This study was a pilot study initiated to determine the viability of a large trial, to pilot the use of web technology for trial conduct and to determine clinically useful outcome measures apart from simple ambulation rates.
Comparisons: Patients randomised to receive either 16mg/24hr or 96mg/24hr dexamethasone.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: