Viewing Study NCT00552669


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 11:03 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-25 @ 8:33 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT00552669
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2010-06-02
First Post: 2007-11-01
Is NOT Gene Therapy: False
Has Adverse Events: True

Brief Title: Study of Oral Rapamycin Plus Bare Metal Stents vs Drug Eltuting Stents
Sponsor: Centro de estudios en Cardiologia Intervencionista
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Phase 4 Study of Randomized Comparison Among Oral Rapamycin Plus Bare Metal Stents Versus Drug Eluting Stents in de Novo Coronary Lesions.
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2009-05
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: ORAR III
Brief Summary: In a previous randomized comparison oral sirolimus plus bare metal stent compared to bare metal stent implantation alone demonstrated at one year of follow up a significant reduction of angiographic and clinical parameters of restenosis (ANMAT resolution number 3366 from June 2004 and Rodriguez A et al JACC,2006,47,1522-1529). In addition previous reported registries from our group with Drug Eluting Stents showed similar amount of reduction in clinical parameters (not angiographic)of restenosis (ERACI III, Rodriguez A et al EuroIntervention 2006,2:53-60). Taking in account that 8.3% of patients treated with oral rapamycin plus Bare Metal Stents(ORAR II Trial JACC 2006)and 8.8% of patients treated with DES developed clinical restenosis (ERACI III Registry, EuroIntervention 2006) the investigators sought to compare differences in overall cost with both revascularization strategies at 1, 2, 3 and 5 years of follow up assuming that safety and efficacy clinical end points would be similar.
Detailed Description: Patients with de novo lesions treated in different Institutions in Buenos Aires Argentina were randomized to treat with oral sirolimus plus bare metal stent implantation (100 patients) or DES(100 patients).

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: None
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:

Secondary ID Infos

Secondary ID Type Domain Link View
01-CECI OTHER Sanatorio Otamendi y Miroli, Buenos Aires, Argentina View
02-IMA OTHER Clinica IMA, Buenos Aires, Argentina View