Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 11:14 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-03 @ 9:50 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT04381169
Status:
TERMINATED
Last Update Posted:
2022-03-21
First Post:
2020-05-02
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Aggressive Versus Non-aggressive Goal-directed Fluid Resuscitation in Acute Pancreatitis
Sponsor:
Enrique de-Madaria
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Effect of Early Weight-based Aggressive Versus Non-aggressive Goal-directed Fluid Resuscitation in the Early Phase of Acute Pancreatitis: an Open-label Multicenter Randomized-controlled Trial
Status:
TERMINATED
Status Verified Date:
2022-03
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Increased frequency of fluid overload on the aggressive fluid resuscitation arm of treatment
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
WATERFALL
Brief Summary:
WATERFALL is an investigator-initiated international multicenter open-label randomized clinical trial comparing aggressive versus moderate fluid resuscitation in acute pancreatitis. The main outcome variable will be the proportion of patients with moderate-to-severe AP. Aggressive fluid resuscitation will consist in Lactated Ringer Solution (LR) 20 ml/kg bolus (administered over 2 hours) followed by LR 3 ml/kg/h and moderate a LR bolus 10 ml/kg in case of hypovolemia or no bolus in patients with normal volemia, followed by LR 1.5 ml/kg/h. The patients will be assessed at 3 (±1), 12 (±4), 24 (±4), 48 (±4) and 72 (±4) hours from recruitment, and fluid resuscitation will be adjusted to the patient´s clinical and analytical status according to a protocol. Subgroup analysis will include patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) at admission, with persistent (\>48h) SIRS and with hypovolemia at admission.
Based on available data (Sternby et al, Ann Surg 2019) we expect a 35% incidence of moderate to severe AP in the moderate arm. Sample sizes of 372 per arm of treatment (744 patients) achieve 80% power to detect a difference of 10% between the treatment arms at a significance level (alpha) of 0.05 using a two-sided z-testNA, assuming a 10% dropout. These results assume that 3 sequential tests are made using the O'Brien-Fleming spending function to determine the test boundaries.
All analyses will be performed on an intention-to-treat basis. The trial could be stop early for efficacy (primary end-point) if the observed two-sided P value is \<0.0002 at the first interim analysis (after 1/3 of patients have been enrolled) or is \<0.012 at second interim analysis (after 2/3 of patients have been enrolled), favoring aggressive fluid resuscitation. At final analysis, the hypothesis that the incidence of moderate-to-severe pancreatitis is similar in the two treatment arms will be rejected if p\<0.046
Based on available data (Sternby et al, Ann Surg 2019) we expect a 35% incidence of moderate to severe AP in the moderate arm. Sample sizes of 372 per arm of treatment (744 patients) achieve 80% power to detect a difference of 10% between the treatment arms at a significance level (alpha) of 0.05 using a two-sided z-testNA, assuming a 10% dropout. These results assume that 3 sequential tests are made using the O'Brien-Fleming spending function to determine the test boundaries.
All analyses will be performed on an intention-to-treat basis. The trial could be stop early for efficacy (primary end-point) if the observed two-sided P value is \<0.0002 at the first interim analysis (after 1/3 of patients have been enrolled) or is \<0.012 at second interim analysis (after 2/3 of patients have been enrolled), favoring aggressive fluid resuscitation. At final analysis, the hypothesis that the incidence of moderate-to-severe pancreatitis is similar in the two treatment arms will be rejected if p\<0.046
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: