Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 11:19 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 9:00 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT03638856
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2020-10-22
First Post:
2018-06-01
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Comparing Effectiveness of Oral Misoprostal for Cervical Priming in Hysteroscopy
Sponsor:
Department of Medical Services Ministry of Public Health of Thailand
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparing Effectiveness of Oral Misoprostal for Cervical Priming in Premenopausal Women Underwent to Diagnostic Hysteroscopy: Double-blind, Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2018-06
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Research objective To compare effectiveness of oral Misoprostal for cervical priming in premenopausal women underwent to diagnostic hysteroscopy Research hypothesis: Null hypothesis Effectiveness of oral misoprostal for cervical priming in premenopausal women underwent to diagnostic hysteroscopy is not different from placebo Alternative hypothesis: : Oral Misoprostal for cervical priming in Premenopausal women underwent to diagnostic hysteroscopy is better than placebo
Detailed Description:
Research design Randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trial. The investigators who assess the outcomes and the participants do not know Misoprostal group or control group. The patients are given the random concealed envelop which contains Misoprostal or placebo to take before hysteroscopy. Surgeon and the investigator whom assess patients do not know group allocation.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: