Viewing Study NCT05837156


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 11:28 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2026-01-08 @ 1:05 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT05837156
Status: UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted: 2023-07-27
First Post: 2023-04-02
Is Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: A Clinical Study to Evaluate Cyclopofol Injection for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
Sponsor: Mengchang Yang
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: A Multicenter, Randomized, Single-blind, Parallel Controlled Clinical Study of Cyclopofol Injection for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
Status: UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date: 2023-07
Last Known Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: This study uses cyclopropofol as a positive control and adopts a large sample, multicenter, randomized, single-blind, positive parallel control test design to explore the clinical application value of cyclopropofol in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting.
Detailed Description: Before the end of the anesthesia maintenance period/operation, it was divided into groups A, B and C according to different drug regimens. The subjects were randomly assigned to one of them in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive cyclopophenol or sevoflurane anesthesia. Each group of subjects should be roughly consistent according to the proportion of each number of PO . After screening the object, the researchers of each testing center are confirmed by the researchers of the center, log in to the random system, fill in the screening information, obtain the random number information, and distribute the corresponding research drugs according to the random number. The number of random shelters is generated through SAS software, which is used as a centralized random grouping system to import the total number of drugs. This study sets up evaluation researchers and drug management researchers. The whole experimental process turned a blind eye to not only the subjects, but also the evaluators. This study has set up evaluation investigators and administrative investigators. Administrative researchers are only involved in the random grouping, dispensing and delivery process. Other processes, including the subject's informed consent, screening, efficacy indicators and safety evaluation, and planned visits, are completed by the evaluation investigators.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: