Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 11:30 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 9:18 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT01752556
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2017-02-08
First Post:
2012-05-17
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Cost-effectiveness of Home Respiratory Polygraphy
Sponsor:
Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Non-inferiority Randomized Control Trial About Efficacy and Cost-effectiveness of Home Respiratory Polygraphy Management in Sleep Apneas/Hypopneas Syndrome
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2016-12
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
HRP-M
Brief Summary:
Primary objectives:
The efficacy of the therapeutic decision taken by respiratory polygraphy (RP) against polysomnography (PSG) using the Epworth scale;
Secondary Objective:
1. the cost-effectiveness of diagnosis and therapeutic decision valued using the Epworth Scale and EuroQol 5D.
2. effectiveness of the therapeutic decision by means of: 1) quality of life tests, 2) adherence and compliance to treatment, 3) blood pressure MAP, 4) biochemistry determinations. Design: prospective, randomized, controlled, open, parallel of non-inferiority. 440 patients will be randomized to diagnose and follow treatment based on the RP or the PSG. The follow-up will last 6 months with 4 assessments. Statistical analysis: We will compare the change in the Epworth scale between both arms of treatment through analysis of covariance. The premise of non-inferiority is -2 at the lower limit of 95% IC. Secondary variables will be analyzed using differences in independent means (or non-parametric equivalent) or Chi2 for dichotomous variables. Cost-effectiveness: costs generated by one and another method will be evaluated against the effectiveness of the primary variable using Bayesian techniques
The efficacy of the therapeutic decision taken by respiratory polygraphy (RP) against polysomnography (PSG) using the Epworth scale;
Secondary Objective:
1. the cost-effectiveness of diagnosis and therapeutic decision valued using the Epworth Scale and EuroQol 5D.
2. effectiveness of the therapeutic decision by means of: 1) quality of life tests, 2) adherence and compliance to treatment, 3) blood pressure MAP, 4) biochemistry determinations. Design: prospective, randomized, controlled, open, parallel of non-inferiority. 440 patients will be randomized to diagnose and follow treatment based on the RP or the PSG. The follow-up will last 6 months with 4 assessments. Statistical analysis: We will compare the change in the Epworth scale between both arms of treatment through analysis of covariance. The premise of non-inferiority is -2 at the lower limit of 95% IC. Secondary variables will be analyzed using differences in independent means (or non-parametric equivalent) or Chi2 for dichotomous variables. Cost-effectiveness: costs generated by one and another method will be evaluated against the effectiveness of the primary variable using Bayesian techniques
Detailed Description:
Design: Prospective, randomized, controlled, open, parallel noninferiority. 440 patients will be randomized to diagnose and follow treatment based on the PR or PSG generating four groups: two treated and two untreated with CPAP. The latter did not undergo self-certification home. The monitoring will be 6 months and 4 assessments. Statistical analysis: compare the change of the scale Epworth before and after the intervention between both treatment arms using analysis of covariance. The premise is non-inferiority of -1.6 at the lower limit of 95%. Secondary variables were analyzed by independent means differences (or nonparametric equivalent) or Chi2 for dichotomous variables. Cost-effectiveness: the costs generated by the two methods will be measured against the effectiveness of the primary endpoint using Bayesian techniques
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: