Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-26 @ 12:16 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-25 @ 12:23 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT02962700
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2016-11-11
First Post:
2016-11-04
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Effects of Continuous Haemofiltration vs Intermittent Haemodialysis on Microcirculatory Parameters in Septic Shock
Sponsor:
Military Hospital of Tunis
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Effects of Continuous Haemofiltration vs Intermittent Haemodialysis on Microcirculatory Parameters in Septic Shock
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2016-11
Last Known Status:
RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The aim of the study was to investigate whether CVVH, in comparison to intermittent haemodialysis (IHD), is able to improve regional perfusion in septic shock patients studied by muscle microdialysis
Detailed Description:
A prospective, randomized, clinical study ,including septic shock patients with acute renal failure, aged over 16 years. Patients were randomized to receive either CVVH or IHD for renal replacement therapy. Intermittent haemodialysis was carried out during the first 4 h at day 1 and day 2 of the study period. Systemic haemodynamics and interstitial tissue concentrations of lactate, pyruvate, glucose and glycerol were obtained at baseline, 6, 12,18 and 24 hours after initiation of renal replacement by using muscle microdialysis.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: