Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 11:30 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 9:18 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT02672956
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2022-03-29
First Post:
2016-01-21
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Comparison of Different Umbilical Port Entry Techniques in Terms of Cosmetic Results
Sponsor:
Zeynep Kamil Maternity and Pediatric Research and Training Hospital
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparison of Different Umbilical Port Entry Techniques in Terms of Cosmetic Results
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2022-03
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Investigators selected participants who operated by laparoscopic technique due to any gynecologic indication according to random number table. The ten mm trocar was inserted supraumbilical, infraumbilical and intraumbilical. The verres needle was not used in all of patients. One month after we evaluated umbilical scar by used vancouver scar scale and compared results of vancouver scar scale.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: