Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 1:40 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-26 @ 4:18 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06116695
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2024-07-31
First Post:
2023-10-27
Is Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Tomographic Evaluation of Pulpotomy in Young Permanent Teeth Using Human-treated Dentin Matrix
Sponsor:
Tanta University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Tomographic Evaluation of Apexogenesis With Human Treated Dentin Matrix in Young Permanent Molars
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2024-07
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Assess tomographic outcomes of pulpotomy in young permanent molars using human-treated dentin matrix versus MTA.
Detailed Description:
The study was conducted as a split-mouth randomized clinical trial, approved by research ethics committee, Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University, and carried out at Pediatric Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University. The material preparation was conducted at Pharmaceutical Technology Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tanta University. 20 children of both sexes aged from 6 to 8 years old were selected with bilateral deeply carious young permanent mandibular first molars that are indicated for pulpotomy procedure.The selected deeply carious molars were randomly divided into two groups as follows:
Group I (Study group): 20 molars were treated with hTDM. Group II:
(Control group): 20 molars were treated with White MTA. The participating cases were evaluated clinically 3, 6, 12 and 18 months. Digital periapical radiographs was taken at 6 month follow-up period to ensure the state of the treated teeth or if there was necessary condition.
Tomographic evaluation was performed immediate postoperatively and at 18 months.
Group I (Study group): 20 molars were treated with hTDM. Group II:
(Control group): 20 molars were treated with White MTA. The participating cases were evaluated clinically 3, 6, 12 and 18 months. Digital periapical radiographs was taken at 6 month follow-up period to ensure the state of the treated teeth or if there was necessary condition.
Tomographic evaluation was performed immediate postoperatively and at 18 months.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: