Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 11:37 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 9:27 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT05993156
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2023-08-15
First Post:
2023-07-06
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Effects of Modified Fixed Twin Block Versus Removable Twin Block on Skeletal Class 2 Growing Patients With Mandibular Deficiency
Sponsor:
Cairo University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Effects of Modified Fixed Twin Block Versus Removable Twin Block on Skeletal Class 2 Growing Patients With Mandibular Deficiency
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2023-08
Last Known Status:
RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Effects of modified fixed twin block versus removable twin block on skeletal class 2 growing patients with mandibular deficiency:
A Randomized Clinical Trial
A Randomized Clinical Trial
Detailed Description:
The main objective of the study is to evaluate the effects of the modified fixed TB on class 2 growing cases and to compare its effect to the conventional removable TB
Research question Does the modified fixed twin block have the same effects as removable twin block during treatment of skeletal class 2 growing patients with mandibular deficiency?
PICO P: Growing skeletal class 2 patients with deficient mandible I : Modified Fixed Twin block C: Conventional removable Twin block
O :
Primary outcome:
Overjet
Secondary outcome:
Soft tissue Profile Antro-posterior mandibular position Mandibular length Antro-posterior maxillary position Upper and lower Incisors inclinations Durability of the appliance Patient Acceptance
Hypothesis:
There is no difference between the modified fixed or removable Twin block appliance regarding overjet reduction, dentoskeletal effects and patient perception.
8\. Trial design: Randomized Clinical Trial Parallel group, two arm, equivalent trial with 1:1 allocation ratio.
Research question Does the modified fixed twin block have the same effects as removable twin block during treatment of skeletal class 2 growing patients with mandibular deficiency?
PICO P: Growing skeletal class 2 patients with deficient mandible I : Modified Fixed Twin block C: Conventional removable Twin block
O :
Primary outcome:
Overjet
Secondary outcome:
Soft tissue Profile Antro-posterior mandibular position Mandibular length Antro-posterior maxillary position Upper and lower Incisors inclinations Durability of the appliance Patient Acceptance
Hypothesis:
There is no difference between the modified fixed or removable Twin block appliance regarding overjet reduction, dentoskeletal effects and patient perception.
8\. Trial design: Randomized Clinical Trial Parallel group, two arm, equivalent trial with 1:1 allocation ratio.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: