Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 11:42 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-12 @ 11:08 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT01921751
Status:
TERMINATED
Last Update Posted:
2018-07-13
First Post:
2013-08-09
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
True
Brief Title:
High or Standard Intensity Radiation Therapy After Gemcitabine Hydrochloride and Nab-paclitaxel in Treating Patients With Pancreatic Cancer That Cannot Be Removed by Surgery
Sponsor:
Radiation Therapy Oncology Group
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
A Phase II Randomized Trial Evaluating the Addition of High or Standard Intensity Radiation to Gemcitabine and Nab-paclitaxel for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
Status:
TERMINATED
Status Verified Date:
2018-06
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Trial would not be completed in a reasonable timeframe per CTEP guidelines
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
This randomized phase II trial studies how well high or standard intensity radiochemotherapy after gemcitabine hydrochloride and paclitaxel albumin-stabilized nanoparticle formulation (nab-paclitaxel) work compared with gemcitabine hydrochloride and nab-paclitaxel alone in treating patients with pancreatic cancer that cannot be removed by surgery. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as gemcitabine hydrochloride and nab-paclitaxel, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing or by stopping them from spreading. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to kill tumor cells. Drugs, such as capecitabine, may make tumor cells more sensitive to radiation therapy. Giving radiation therapy in different ways and adding chemotherapy may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known whether high intensity radiochemotherapy after gemcitabine hydrochloride and nab-paclitaxel is more effective than standard intensity radiochemotherapy after gemcitabine hydrochloride and nab-paclitaxel or gemcitabine hydrochloride and nab-paclitaxel alone in treating pancreatic cancer.
Detailed Description:
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
* I. To determine if intensified radiochemotherapy following gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer will show a signal for improved 2-year overall survival (OS) from 10% to 22.5% as compared to chemotherapy with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel alone.
* II. To determine if standard radiochemotherapy, following gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel, in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer will show a signal for improved 2-year OS from 10% to 22.5% as compared to chemotherapy with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel alone.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
* I. To evaluate patterns of failure (local and systemic progression) by SMAD family member 4 (SMAD4) status and intensity of radiation therapy.
* II. To evaluate the impact of radiochemotherapy on OS for the subset of SMAD4 intact patients.
* III. To evaluate adverse events associated with the treatments.
* IV. To evaluate correlation between SMAD4 status determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and genetic SMAD4 status.
Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 1 month and then every 3 months.
* I. To determine if intensified radiochemotherapy following gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer will show a signal for improved 2-year overall survival (OS) from 10% to 22.5% as compared to chemotherapy with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel alone.
* II. To determine if standard radiochemotherapy, following gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel, in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer will show a signal for improved 2-year OS from 10% to 22.5% as compared to chemotherapy with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel alone.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
* I. To evaluate patterns of failure (local and systemic progression) by SMAD family member 4 (SMAD4) status and intensity of radiation therapy.
* II. To evaluate the impact of radiochemotherapy on OS for the subset of SMAD4 intact patients.
* III. To evaluate adverse events associated with the treatments.
* IV. To evaluate correlation between SMAD4 status determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and genetic SMAD4 status.
Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 1 month and then every 3 months.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
Secondary ID Infos
| Secondary ID | Type | Domain | Link | View |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCI-2013-01280 | REGISTRY | CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program) | View | |
| RTOG 1201 | OTHER | NRG Oncology | View | |
| RTOG-1201 | OTHER | CTEP | View | |
| U10CA180868 | NIH | None | https://reporter.nih.gov/quic… | View |
| U10CA021661 | NIH | None | https://reporter.nih.gov/quic… | View |