Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 11:44 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-02 @ 7:39 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06898151
Status:
RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2025-08-15
First Post:
2025-03-03
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Carotid Endarterectomy and Stenting Timing
Sponsor:
Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Carotid Endarterectomy and Stenting Timingļ¼The CEST Trial
Status:
RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2025-08
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
CEST
Brief Summary:
To compare the safety and efficacy of carotid revascularization performed within 48 hours versus after 14 days in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis accompanied with MRI-confirmed acute infarction (high signal on diffusion-weighted imaging accompanied by low apparent diffusion coefficient signal) in the responsible vascular territory.
Detailed Description:
Carotid artery stenosis is an important cause of stroke, and about 20-30% of ischemic stroke can be attributed to carotid artery stenosis. In the past 20 years, the prevalence of carotid artery stenosis in my country has increased by 70.07%, which has imposed a heavy burden on the national economy and society. At present, for symptomatic carotid artery stenosis, carotid artery revascularization, mainly carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS), combined with optimal drug therapy (antiplatelet + lipid-lowering), has become the mainstream treatment. In 2004, Rothwell et al. conducted a meta-analysis of individual case data from the European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST) and the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET). The results showed that when the waiting time between the onset of symptoms and the receipt of revascularization was prolonged, the effect of carotid artery revascularization in preventing future strokes would be significantly weakened. The latest guidelines issued by the European Stroke Organisation (ESO) recommend that 50-99% of patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis undergo acute CEA, preferably within 14 days after the ischemic event. Based on these clinical research evidence, an increasing number of patients have undergone acute CEA over the past two decades. For example, a study in the United States confirmed that the median waiting time from the occurrence of an ischemic event to receiving CEA decreased from 22 days in 2009 to 12 days in 2014, and the proportion of patients treated within the 14-day interval increased from 37% to 58%. Similarly, data from Germany from 2003 to 2014 showed that the interval from the ischemic event to receiving CEA decreased from 28 days to 8 days. Despite this, in China, the proportion of patients who received carotid revascularization within 14 days is still relatively low due to concerns about increased perioperative complications of acute revascularization.
Previously, the investigators retrospectively analyzed 1172 patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis, and used diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) sequences to identify whether there was acute new infarction before surgery. Further analysis found that for patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis combined with acute new infarction, regardless of the type of revascularization (CEA or CAS), the risk of postoperative serious adverse events was significantly increased. Therefore, for patients with preoperative new infarction on MRI, the investigators urgently need more effective treatment strategies to reduce the incidence of postoperative adverse events and improve the long-term prognosis of patients. The discussion of the timing of surgery is an important part of the treatment strategy. However, there is no large-scale clinical study report on whether preoperative new infarction on MRI has an auxiliary effect on the optimal timing of surgery for symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Therefore, the investigators plan to initiate a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded RCT trial to explore whether preoperative new infarction on MRI can serve as a new marker for the safety and effectiveness of revascularization surgery in patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis.
Previously, the investigators retrospectively analyzed 1172 patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis, and used diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) sequences to identify whether there was acute new infarction before surgery. Further analysis found that for patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis combined with acute new infarction, regardless of the type of revascularization (CEA or CAS), the risk of postoperative serious adverse events was significantly increased. Therefore, for patients with preoperative new infarction on MRI, the investigators urgently need more effective treatment strategies to reduce the incidence of postoperative adverse events and improve the long-term prognosis of patients. The discussion of the timing of surgery is an important part of the treatment strategy. However, there is no large-scale clinical study report on whether preoperative new infarction on MRI has an auxiliary effect on the optimal timing of surgery for symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Therefore, the investigators plan to initiate a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded RCT trial to explore whether preoperative new infarction on MRI can serve as a new marker for the safety and effectiveness of revascularization surgery in patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: