Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-26 @ 10:46 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-26 @ 10:46 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT02179112
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2024-05-22
First Post:
2014-06-29
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Determining Universal Processes Related to Best Outcome in Emergency Gastrointestinal Surgery: an International Evaluation
Sponsor:
University of Edinburgh
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
None
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2021-06
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
GlobalSurg-1
Brief Summary:
A multicentre, international evaluation of emergency abdominal surgery to establish surgical outcomes and identify common, modifiable best practice processes.
Detailed Description:
Background: With over 200 million surgical operations per year worldwide and with nearly every acute hospital providing surgical services, outcomes from emergency general surgery represent internationally important healthcare markers. Best practice and modifiable processes that are relevant to good patient outcomes around the world require validation using patient-level data.
Aim: The primary aim of this study is to identify internationally relevant, modifiable surgical practices (in terms of modifiable equipment and clinical management) associated with best care. These factors will include use of imaging, supplementary oxygen, pulse oximetry, critical care, and safety checklists.
Method: This is a multicentre, international, prospective cohort study. Any hospital in the world performing acute surgery will be eligible to enter. Any patient undergoing emergency surgery with an incision entering the peritoneal cavity is eligible. Routine, anonymised clinical data on consecutive patients will be collected over a two week period in each surgical centre, with up to 30 days follow-up data collected. The primary outcome is 24-hour post-operative mortality rate. Secondary outcomes include 30-day inpatient post-operative mortality rate, and 30-day serious complication rate. Participating centres will also be asked to complete a survey that will collect data on hospital structural and resource characteristics.
Data will be entered and stored securely via the University of Edinburgh's REDCap system. This pragmatic protocol (which will delivered across many low-resource settings) does not allow for independent verification of data entry. Data collection norms are laid out in the protocol, where data definitions are also clearly provided. Sample size is not relevant to this exploratory audit. Centres will only be included where there is at least 95% data completeness.
Potential explanatory variables that will be explored in subsequent analysis include country Human Developmental Index, and resource differences.
Aim: The primary aim of this study is to identify internationally relevant, modifiable surgical practices (in terms of modifiable equipment and clinical management) associated with best care. These factors will include use of imaging, supplementary oxygen, pulse oximetry, critical care, and safety checklists.
Method: This is a multicentre, international, prospective cohort study. Any hospital in the world performing acute surgery will be eligible to enter. Any patient undergoing emergency surgery with an incision entering the peritoneal cavity is eligible. Routine, anonymised clinical data on consecutive patients will be collected over a two week period in each surgical centre, with up to 30 days follow-up data collected. The primary outcome is 24-hour post-operative mortality rate. Secondary outcomes include 30-day inpatient post-operative mortality rate, and 30-day serious complication rate. Participating centres will also be asked to complete a survey that will collect data on hospital structural and resource characteristics.
Data will be entered and stored securely via the University of Edinburgh's REDCap system. This pragmatic protocol (which will delivered across many low-resource settings) does not allow for independent verification of data entry. Data collection norms are laid out in the protocol, where data definitions are also clearly provided. Sample size is not relevant to this exploratory audit. Centres will only be included where there is at least 95% data completeness.
Potential explanatory variables that will be explored in subsequent analysis include country Human Developmental Index, and resource differences.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: