Viewing Study NCT01990612


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-26 @ 10:46 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-26 @ 10:46 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT01990612
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2019-02-21
First Post: 2013-11-15
Is NOT Gene Therapy: False
Has Adverse Events: True

Brief Title: A Randomized Trial of Induction Versus Expectant Management
Sponsor: The George Washington University Biostatistics Center
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Induction in Nulliparous Women at 39 Weeks to Prevent Adverse Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2019-02
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: ARRIVE
Brief Summary: A randomized clinical trial to assess whether elective induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation compared with expectant management will improve outcomes.
Detailed Description: Given the reported increased risks of adverse events in pregnancies extending beyond 39 weeks it has been hypothesized that a policy of planned elective induction at 39 weeks could improve outcomes for the infant and the mother. For multiparous patients, especially those with a favorable cervix, it is perhaps easy to justify an elective induction at 39 weeks given the low risk of cesarean section. However, for nulliparous patients the current evidence, derived mainly from retrospective observational studies, does not allow a clear recommendation. Nevertheless, a trend towards an increased rate of elective labor induction in pregnancies at 39 weeks has been reported, indicating that practitioners are more commonly using elective induction at this gestational age,even as others caution against routine elective induction prior to 41 weeks given the reported increased risk of cesarean delivery. Ultimately, a randomized controlled trial is necessary to satisfactorily understand whether elective induction of labor of nulliparas at 39 weeks improves neonatal and maternal outcomes.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: None
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:

Secondary ID Infos

Secondary ID Type Domain Link View
UG1HD027869 NIH None https://reporter.nih.gov/quic… View
UG1HD027915 NIH None https://reporter.nih.gov/quic… View
UG1HD034116 NIH None https://reporter.nih.gov/quic… View
UG1HD034208 NIH None https://reporter.nih.gov/quic… View
UG1HD040500 NIH None https://reporter.nih.gov/quic… View
UG1HD040485 NIH None https://reporter.nih.gov/quic… View
UG1HD040544 NIH None https://reporter.nih.gov/quic… View
UG1HD053097 NIH None https://reporter.nih.gov/quic… View
UG1HD040545 NIH None https://reporter.nih.gov/quic… View
UG1HD040560 NIH None https://reporter.nih.gov/quic… View
UG1HD087230 NIH None https://reporter.nih.gov/quic… View
UG1HD087192 NIH None https://reporter.nih.gov/quic… View
UG1HD040512 NIH None https://reporter.nih.gov/quic… View
UG1HD068258 NIH None https://reporter.nih.gov/quic… View
UG1HD068268 NIH None https://reporter.nih.gov/quic… View
U10HD036801 NIH None https://reporter.nih.gov/quic… View
UG1HD068282 NIH None https://reporter.nih.gov/quic… View