Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 11:57 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 9:54 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06889051
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2025-03-21
First Post:
2025-03-15
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Comparison of Flexible & Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath vs. Antegrade Suction in Retrograde Flexible Ureteroscopy for Lower Calyceal Stones
Sponsor:
Benha University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparison Study Between Using Retrograde Flexible Ureteroscopy With Flexible & Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Versus Retrograde Flexible Ureteroscopy With Antegrade Suction in Lower Calyceal Stone: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2025-03
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of two suction techniques during retrograde flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) for lower calyceal renal stones measuring 1.5-2 cm. The study evaluates Flexible \& Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath (FANS) versus Antegrade Suction (via percutaneous access) in improving stone-free rates (SFR), reducing operative time, and minimizing complications such as bleeding, ureteral injury, and infection. A total of 120 adult patients will be randomized into two groups, undergoing either flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) with Flexible \& Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath (FANS) or flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) with antegrade suction, at Banha University Faculty of Medicine.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: