Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 12:18 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-08 @ 11:38 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT03634358
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2018-08-16
First Post:
2018-01-13
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Bipolar Scissors for Circumcision
Sponsor:
Zagazig University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Bipolar Scissors Versus Classic Method for Circumcision
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2018-08
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
comparing the outcomes of using bipolar scissors for male circumcision to the classic scalpel method
Detailed Description:
A prospective, randomized study, comparing two different techniques for pediatric male circumcision: the bipolar diathermy scissors technique with that of a classic scalpel technique. Study included male infants from 40 days old up to 18 month old. They were reviewed regarding Operative time, bleeding, complications, postoperative pain and morbidity. Differences in the outcome were compared.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: