Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 12:36 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 10:44 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT05173467
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2021-12-30
First Post:
2021-12-13
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Robot-assisted Invasion-controlled Surgery Versus Traditional-open Surgery Against Metastatic Spinal Tumor
Sponsor:
Wei Xu
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Robot-assisted Invasion-controlled Surgery Versus Traditional-open Surgery Against Metastatic Spinal Tumor
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2021-12
Last Known Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
With significant advances in diagnostic imaging and systemic therapies for oncologic disease, spinal metastasis with neurological dysfunction and mechanical instability has become an indication for surgery. Even if traditional-open surgery was palliative, the treatment of spinal metastasis also carried significant surgical morbidity. Those high morbidity and complication rates may influence the quality of patients with a limited life expectancy. Invasion-controlled surgery was utilized with Robot-assisted surgery approach against symptomatic spinal metastasis.
Increasing interest in the potential for improved consistency, complication reduction, and decreased length of hospitalization through robot utilization is evident from the rapid growth of publications seen in recent years.
So, the investigators wish to evaluate the advantages of Robot-assisted Invasion-controlled Surgery compared with traditional-open surgery spinal surgery in patients with metastatic spinal cord compression.
Increasing interest in the potential for improved consistency, complication reduction, and decreased length of hospitalization through robot utilization is evident from the rapid growth of publications seen in recent years.
So, the investigators wish to evaluate the advantages of Robot-assisted Invasion-controlled Surgery compared with traditional-open surgery spinal surgery in patients with metastatic spinal cord compression.
Detailed Description:
Surgical Spinal Decompression of Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression, Minimal Access Versus Open Surgery. A prospective Clinical Trial
Purpose To investigate the effect of Robot-assisted Invasion-controlled Surgery compared with traditional-open surgery in the treatment of patients with metastatic spinalcord compression.
Hypotheses The group of patient's receiving robot-assisted invasion-controlled surgery will have better improvement in quality after surgery compared to the group that will receive traditional open surgery. The robot-assisted invasion-controlled surgery group will have reduction in per-operative bleeding and less wound complications compered to the group of patients receiving open or traditional surgery.
Purpose To investigate the effect of Robot-assisted Invasion-controlled Surgery compared with traditional-open surgery in the treatment of patients with metastatic spinalcord compression.
Hypotheses The group of patient's receiving robot-assisted invasion-controlled surgery will have better improvement in quality after surgery compared to the group that will receive traditional open surgery. The robot-assisted invasion-controlled surgery group will have reduction in per-operative bleeding and less wound complications compered to the group of patients receiving open or traditional surgery.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: