Viewing Study NCT06541067


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-25 @ 12:41 AM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-26 @ 5:34 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT06541067
Status: RECRUITING
Last Update Posted: 2025-01-30
First Post: 2024-07-24
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Study of Posaconazole Prophylaxis in Patients Receiving Hematopoietic Stem Cell Allograft (allo-HSC) At High Risk of Invasive Fungal Infection (IFI)
Sponsor: Nantes University Hospital
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Study of Posaconazole Prophylaxis in Patients Receiving Hematopoietic Stem Cell Allograft (allo-HSC) At High Risk of Invasive Fungal Infection (IFI): POSALLO Study
Status: RECRUITING
Status Verified Date: 2025-01
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: POSALLO
Brief Summary: Patients receiving an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-CSH) are at high risk of infection, particularly of fungal origin. Until the 2018 recommendations of the 6th European Conference on Infections in Leukemia (ECIL6), primary prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections (IFI), in allograft patients, was based on the administration of fluconazole until D100. Due to changes in transplantation practices (alternative donor transplantation, sequential transplantation, etc.) and changes in microbiological ecology (increased incidence of IFIs caused by filamentous germs such as aspergillosis and mycormycosis), fluconazole prophylaxis is now sometimes suboptimal. It is therefore recommended that patients at high risk of developing IFIs should be given azole molecules with activity against filamentous agents as primary prophylaxis during the first 3 months after transplantation.

Posaconazole is often under-dosed (below the minimum effective concentration). It therefore seems essential to carry out a prospective study with close \[C\]min dosing in the specific situation of allograft patients, a population that appears to be at risk of underdosing in the light of initial retrospective analysis results.
Detailed Description: There are several treatments based on azole molecules: voriconazole, posaconazole, isavuconazole... To date, none of these treatments has been approved for primary post-allograft prophylaxis. Posaconazole is indicated in cases of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (requiring systemic corticosteroid therapy after allo-CSH), and as primary prophylaxis during aplasia in patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia/myelodysplasia (AML/MDS). Other azole molecules are not approved for primary prophylaxis, and may give rise to drug interactions with certain treatments prescribed for allograft patients (e.g. ciclosporin, letermovir).

Although recommendations for the administration of posaconazole as primary prophylaxis post allo-CSH have been in place for 4 years, few studies are available to date. The adult hematology department of Nantes University Hospital conducted a retrospective study of 70 allograft patients at high risk of IFI between 04/2020 and 12/2021. Posaconazole treatment was administered from D0 (or the day after the 2nd dose of post-transplant cyclophosphamide) to D100. Treatment was generally well tolerated, with discontinuation due to possible treatment toxicity in 12.6% of cases, mainly of hepatic origin (n=7). Posaconazole was resumed in 2 cases without recurrence of toxicity. In 84.2% of patients, no IFI was observed. One of the limitations of this study was the low number of determinations of residual posaconazole concentration (\[C\]min). In fact, \[C\]min was carried out in only 59 patients/70, with a median delay of 9 days. In 43% of cases, the \[C\]min was insufficient (\< 0.5 mg/L), which is significantly lower than the \[C\]min obtained in patients with AML/MDS undergoing induction (\[C\]min\< 0.5 mg/L: 5% of patients). It therefore seems essential to carry out a prospective study with close \[C\]min measurement in the specific situation of allograft patients, a population that appears to be at risk of underdosing in the light of the initial retrospective results of analyses.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: