Viewing Study NCT02823093


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-25 @ 12:56 AM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-25 @ 11:11 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT02823093
Status: UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted: 2017-01-31
First Post: 2016-04-25
Is NOT Gene Therapy: False
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Aortic Calcification and Vitamin K Antagonists
Sponsor: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Aortic Calcification and Vitamin K Antagonists
Status: UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date: 2017-01
Last Known Status: RECRUITING
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: AVKAL
Brief Summary: The vitamin K antagonists (VKA) are necessary drugs of prevention and treatment of thrombo-embolic disease. The AVKAL study assesses the impact of VKA treatment on the aortic calcifications development. This is a biomedical research without health product, transversal and monocentric study which compares the aortic calcifications levels of two populations : one treated by VKA and the other which has never been treated by VKA.
Detailed Description: The vitamin K antagonists exercise their anticoagulant effect by preventing the vitamin K dependant gamma-carboxylation of coagulation II, VII, IX and X factors which forms the final step of their activation.

They inhibit the vitamin K epoxide reductase VKORC1 enzyme, which is responsible of the vitamin K epoxide recycling in vitamin K hydroquinone (its reduced form). The carboxylation also can be inhibited by the Matrix Gla protein (MGP), inhibitor factor of vascular calcifications.

Warfarin (the most used VKA at the word level) is employed on animal for produce vascular calcifications by inhibiting the MGP activation.

Epidemiologic data indicate that warfarin could increase the calcifications of cardiac valves and coronary arteries. However, these studies were not interested in abdominal aorta's calcifications which are considered like an important marker of cardiovascular risk and did not concern the fluindione which is the most used VKA in France. Even if a class effect seems logical, the investigators can't dismiss the local effects, different to warfarin. In these studies, the calcifications assessment were rarely quantitative and the MGP levels were not measured. The vascular calcifications constitute a potential adverse effect of VKA which could limit their benefit in certain populations.

In this work there is an assumption that the aortic calcifications levels are upper in patients receiving VKA than in patients who are not receiving VKA and the aortic calcifications increase is owed to the non-activation of MGP.

The main objective is to assess if the taking of VKA is associated with the aortic calcifications development in patients receiving VKA.

Investigators will compare 2 populations: one group treated by VKA treatment for at least 6 months and one focus group which have never been treated by VKA treatment.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: None
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: