Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 1:08 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 1:08 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT05350293
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2022-05-04
First Post:
2022-04-22
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Evaluation of the Abutment Type Following Oral Implants in Terms of the Surrounding Bone Height
Sponsor:
Damascus University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Evaluation of Two Different Types of Abutments on Post-prosthesis Bone Resorption: A Randomized Controlled Clinical and Radiological Trial
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2022-04
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Compare two different types of abutments (molded abutments and computer-designed 3D printed abutments) in terms of the amount of bone loss, and depth of periodontal pockets around the implant during different periods.
Detailed Description:
In the past few years, the number of research conducted on the designs of abutments and materials has increased. Often, the restoration is done over the implant using standard abutments that the implant company prefabricated, but due to the problems facing the dentist from the occurrence of bone absorption, an increase in the depth of the pocket after restoration, other types of abutment design methods have been introduced as needed (molded abutment made by lost wax technique and computer-designed abutment made using a 3D laser printer), those customised abutments were made special for each patient depending on their conditions.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: