Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 1:12 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 11:22 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT02665793
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2019-10-22
First Post:
2016-01-25
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Mechanisms Underlying Peanut Allergic Reactions in TRACE Peanut Study Participants: Extension Study
Sponsor:
Imperial College London
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Mechanisms Underlying the Change in Threshold or Severity of Peanut-allergic Reactions in TRACE Peanut Study Participants - Extension Study
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2019-10
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
TRACEextension
Brief Summary:
Food allergy affects up to 10% of the population. The mainstay of management involves dietary avoidance and provision of rescue medication in the event of an accidental reaction. The Integrated approaches to food allergen and allergy management (iFAAM) collaboration is an EU-funded academic/clinical/industry consortium with the aim to improve allergen risk management including food labelling. Much of this work requires the validation of the minimum 'eliciting dose' for the food-allergic population and how this can be translated into risk management.
A number of studies (including iFAAM and the TRACE study - NCT01429896) have assessed the eliciting dose for peanut allergic patients, using food challenges where peanut-allergic individuals are eat incremental doses of peanut under strict medical supervision.
In this extension study, peanut-allergic subjects will have undergone (in a cross-over manner) three double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges to peanut:
1. incremental doses of peanut in a water-continuous matrix;
2. incremental doses of peanut baked into a cookie biscuit;
3. a single dose of peanut in a water-continuous matrix.
The differences in eliciting dose, symptom pattern and underlying physiological mechanisms will provide essential data on how the presentation and consumption of peanut affects the amount needed to trigger an allergic reaction, to inform industry and food regulators as to how to best protect the food-allergic population.
A number of studies (including iFAAM and the TRACE study - NCT01429896) have assessed the eliciting dose for peanut allergic patients, using food challenges where peanut-allergic individuals are eat incremental doses of peanut under strict medical supervision.
In this extension study, peanut-allergic subjects will have undergone (in a cross-over manner) three double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges to peanut:
1. incremental doses of peanut in a water-continuous matrix;
2. incremental doses of peanut baked into a cookie biscuit;
3. a single dose of peanut in a water-continuous matrix.
The differences in eliciting dose, symptom pattern and underlying physiological mechanisms will provide essential data on how the presentation and consumption of peanut affects the amount needed to trigger an allergic reaction, to inform industry and food regulators as to how to best protect the food-allergic population.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
Secondary ID Infos
| Secondary ID | Type | Domain | Link | View |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FP7-KBBE 312147 | OTHER_GRANT | European Commission | View |