Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 1:21 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-31 @ 6:08 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06663293
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2025-11-19
First Post:
2024-10-17
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Comparison of High Flow vs Standard Nasal Cannula in Children With Burns Under Sedoanalgesia
Sponsor:
Zeliha Alicikus
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparison of High Flow and Conventional Nasal Cannula Outcomes in Pediatric Burn Patients Under Sedoanalgesia: A Prospective Randomized Study
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2025-11
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The aim of this study is to investigate the positive effects of high-flow oxygen therapy on the reduction of airway adverse events and recovery time compared to conventional nasal oxygen therapy in pediatric burns treated with procedural sedoanalgesia.
Detailed Description:
High flow nasal cannula oxygenation (HFNCO) has gained popularity in pediatric anesthesia practice. The basic mechanism of HFNCO involves reducing metabolic cost and work of breathing, decreasing nasopharyngeal resistance, and improving gas conditioning and secretion clearance. Heating and humidifying the oxygen administered make it easier for patients to tolerate high flow. The flow rate can be adjusted for all age groups. However, there are no studies in the literature investigating the effectiveness of HFNCO during procedural sedation in pediatric burn patients.
This randomized prospective study was performed in 50 patients aged 1-14 years in the pediatric burn unit. Patients were divided into two groups as Group HFO: High flow oxygen (n: 25) and Group NC: nasal cannula oxygen (n: 25). Age, sex, burn percentage, concomitant diseases, ASA score, BMI (body mass index), respiratory and hemodynamic parameters, recovery time and presence of complications during sedoanalgesia were recorded.
This randomized prospective study was performed in 50 patients aged 1-14 years in the pediatric burn unit. Patients were divided into two groups as Group HFO: High flow oxygen (n: 25) and Group NC: nasal cannula oxygen (n: 25). Age, sex, burn percentage, concomitant diseases, ASA score, BMI (body mass index), respiratory and hemodynamic parameters, recovery time and presence of complications during sedoanalgesia were recorded.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: