Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 1:22 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-03 @ 9:54 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06968793
Status:
RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2025-05-22
First Post:
2025-05-05
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Use of Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressure to Assess Inspiratory Effort During Pressure Support Ventilation
Sponsor:
Jian-Xin Zhou
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Use of Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressure to Assess Inspiratory Effort During Pressure Support Ventilation: a Prospective Physiological Study
Status:
RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2025-05
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
During pressure support ventilation (PSV), monitoring of Esophageal Pressure (Pes) has long been considered the gold standard for assessing intrathoracic pressure and the state of respiratory mechanics.The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between Cuff Pressure (Pcuff) and Esophageal Pressure in patients undergoing tracheal intubation or tracheotomy, and to assess whether Pcuff can be used as a surrogate for Pes for reflecting changes in intrathoracic pressure.The correlation and its consistency between the two under different ventilation conditions were analysed by synchronously monitoring the ΔPcuff and ΔPes to further validate the potential application value of cuff pressure in clinical practice.The results of the study will provide a more convenient and non-invasive method of monitoring intrathoracic pressure in mechanically ventilated patients, thus optimising ventilation strategies, reducing complications, and promoting the innovation and development of monitoring technology in the field of critical care medicine.
Detailed Description:
Monitoring of Esophageal pressure (Pes) has long been regarded as the gold standard for assessing intrathoracic pressure and respiratory mechanics. The measurement of Esophageal pressure provides indirect information about pleural pressure, which is critical for understanding respiratory mechanics, optimizing mechanical ventilation strategies, and evaluating respiratory muscle load.
However, despite its clinical significance, Esophageal pressure monitoring involves a relatively complex and invasive procedure. Measurement typically requires the insertion of an esophageal catheter via the nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal route, which may cause patient discomfort and prove challenging in certain cases (e.g., esophageal pathologies or anatomical abnormalities). Consequently, while esophageal pressure remains the current gold standard for evaluating intrathoracic pressure, its clinical application faces limitations.
In contrast, Cuff pressure (Pcuff) monitoring in intubated or tracheostomized patients is simpler and routinely performed. Cuff pressure measurement primarily ensures tracheal tube sealing to prevent gas leakage and aspiration, while also reducing the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Our preliminary exploratory studies have revealed correlations between Cuff pressure fluctuations and Esophageal pressure, particularly in patients undergoing pressure support ventilation. This finding suggests the potential utility of Cuff pressure as a surrogate marker for intrathoracic pressure. Esophageal pressure inherently reflects pleural pressure through Esophageal pressure changes, while the artificial airway cuff-positioned above the carina within the trachea-detects subtle pressure variations induced by adjacent muscle activity during forceful breathing. These measurements may indirectly indicate inspiratory effort. Variations in cuff positioning might influence results, and our exploratory attempts demonstrated strong waveform correlations between Cuff pressure and Esophageal pressure.
However, despite its clinical significance, Esophageal pressure monitoring involves a relatively complex and invasive procedure. Measurement typically requires the insertion of an esophageal catheter via the nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal route, which may cause patient discomfort and prove challenging in certain cases (e.g., esophageal pathologies or anatomical abnormalities). Consequently, while esophageal pressure remains the current gold standard for evaluating intrathoracic pressure, its clinical application faces limitations.
In contrast, Cuff pressure (Pcuff) monitoring in intubated or tracheostomized patients is simpler and routinely performed. Cuff pressure measurement primarily ensures tracheal tube sealing to prevent gas leakage and aspiration, while also reducing the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Our preliminary exploratory studies have revealed correlations between Cuff pressure fluctuations and Esophageal pressure, particularly in patients undergoing pressure support ventilation. This finding suggests the potential utility of Cuff pressure as a surrogate marker for intrathoracic pressure. Esophageal pressure inherently reflects pleural pressure through Esophageal pressure changes, while the artificial airway cuff-positioned above the carina within the trachea-detects subtle pressure variations induced by adjacent muscle activity during forceful breathing. These measurements may indirectly indicate inspiratory effort. Variations in cuff positioning might influence results, and our exploratory attempts demonstrated strong waveform correlations between Cuff pressure and Esophageal pressure.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: