Raw JSON
{'hasResults': False, 'derivedSection': {'miscInfoModule': {'versionHolder': '2025-12-24'}, 'conditionBrowseModule': {'meshes': [{'id': 'D001281', 'term': 'Atrial Fibrillation'}], 'ancestors': [{'id': 'D001145', 'term': 'Arrhythmias, Cardiac'}, {'id': 'D006331', 'term': 'Heart Diseases'}, {'id': 'D002318', 'term': 'Cardiovascular Diseases'}, {'id': 'D010335', 'term': 'Pathologic Processes'}, {'id': 'D013568', 'term': 'Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms'}]}}, 'protocolSection': {'designModule': {'phases': ['NA'], 'studyType': 'INTERVENTIONAL', 'designInfo': {'allocation': 'RANDOMIZED', 'maskingInfo': {'masking': 'NONE'}, 'primaryPurpose': 'TREATMENT', 'interventionModel': 'PARALLEL'}, 'enrollmentInfo': {'type': 'ACTUAL', 'count': 150}}, 'statusModule': {'overallStatus': 'COMPLETED', 'startDateStruct': {'date': '2012-01'}, 'expandedAccessInfo': {'hasExpandedAccess': False}, 'statusVerifiedDate': '2014-09', 'completionDateStruct': {'date': '2014-06', 'type': 'ACTUAL'}, 'lastUpdateSubmitDate': '2014-09-10', 'studyFirstSubmitDate': '2014-09-09', 'studyFirstSubmitQcDate': '2014-09-10', 'lastUpdatePostDateStruct': {'date': '2014-09-12', 'type': 'ESTIMATED'}, 'studyFirstPostDateStruct': {'date': '2014-09-12', 'type': 'ESTIMATED'}, 'primaryCompletionDateStruct': {'date': '2014-06', 'type': 'ACTUAL'}}, 'outcomesModule': {'primaryOutcomes': [{'measure': 'Arrhythmia-free survival', 'timeFrame': '1 year', 'description': 'arrhythmia-free outcome during 1 year after the procedure'}], 'secondaryOutcomes': [{'measure': 'Recurrence if PV conduction after ablation in PVs with abolished dormant conduction', 'timeFrame': '1 year', 'description': 'PV conduction recurrences after elimination of dormant conduction. This endpoint will be evaluated during repeat procedures for recurrences of atrial fibrillation or atrial tachycardia.'}]}, 'oversightModule': {'oversightHasDmc': False}, 'conditionsModule': {'keywords': ['paroxysmal atrial fibrillation', 'pulmonary vein isolation', 'adenosine', 'AF terminatin'], 'conditions': ['Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation']}, 'referencesModule': {'references': [{'pmid': '26297786', 'type': 'DERIVED', 'citation': 'Theis C, Konrad T, Mollnau H, Sonnenschein S, Kampfner D, Potstawa M, Ocete BQ, Bock K, Himmrich E, Munzel T, Rostock T. Arrhythmia Termination Versus Elimination of Dormant Pulmonary Vein Conduction as a Procedural End Point of Catheter Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Prospective Randomized Trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015 Oct;8(5):1080-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.115.002786. Epub 2015 Aug 21.'}]}, 'descriptionModule': {'briefSummary': 'This study investigates impact of adenosine versus AF inducibility and subsequent termination on the acute and long-term outcome of paroxysmal AF ablation.', 'detailedDescription': 'Despite intensive efforts to increase single procedure success rates of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), an arrhythmia-free surveillance has not raised beyond 80%. This prospective, randomized study investigates the efficacy of two different procedural endpoints in terms of single-procedure arrhythmia-free outcome.\n\nA total number of 152 patients undergoing de-novo catheter ablation for paroxysmal AF will be randomized to two different treatment arms. In group-A patients, PVI will be performed with the patient either in spontaneous or induced AF. If AF will not terminate with PVI, ablation will be continued by targeting extra-PV AF sources with the desired endpoint of termination to sinus rhythm (SR). The ablation procedure in group-B patients consists of PVI exclusively, regardless to the underlying rhythm. In this group, all isolated PVs will be challenged to adenosine administration in the attempt to reveal and ablate dormant conduction. The primary endpoint is arrhythmia-free survival during a follow-up of 1 year.'}, 'eligibilityModule': {'sex': 'ALL', 'stdAges': ['ADULT', 'OLDER_ADULT'], 'minimumAge': '18 Years', 'healthyVolunteers': False, 'eligibilityCriteria': 'Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* patients with paroxysmal AF\n* de-novo AF ablation\n* age \\> 18 years\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* persistent AF\n* previous cardioversion'}, 'identificationModule': {'nctId': 'NCT02238392', 'briefTitle': 'Adenosine vs AF Termination for Paroxysmal AF Ablation', 'organization': {'class': 'OTHER', 'fullName': 'Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz'}, 'officialTitle': 'Arrhythmia Inducibility Versus Elimination of Dormant PV Conduction as a Procedural Endpoint of Catheter Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: a Prospective Randomized Trial', 'orgStudyIdInfo': {'id': '1/2014'}}, 'armsInterventionsModule': {'armGroups': [{'type': 'ACTIVE_COMPARATOR', 'label': 'Group A', 'description': 'Adenosine testing after PVI and elimination of dormant conduction', 'interventionNames': ['Procedure: Adenosine test']}, {'type': 'ACTIVE_COMPARATOR', 'label': 'Group B - Termination of AF', 'description': 'Termination of atrial fibrillation by catheter ablation', 'interventionNames': ['Procedure: Termination of AF']}], 'interventions': [{'name': 'Adenosine test', 'type': 'PROCEDURE', 'description': 'Testing dormant conduction after PVI', 'armGroupLabels': ['Group A']}, {'name': 'Termination of AF', 'type': 'PROCEDURE', 'description': 'Testing AF iducibility and ermination of', 'armGroupLabels': ['Group B - Termination of AF']}]}, 'contactsLocationsModule': {'locations': [{'zip': '55131', 'city': 'Mainz', 'country': 'Germany', 'facility': 'University Hospital Mainz, Department of Medicine II', 'geoPoint': {'lat': 49.98185, 'lon': 8.28008}}], 'overallOfficials': [{'name': 'Thomas Rostock, MD', 'role': 'PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR', 'affiliation': 'University Hospital Mainz, Dept. of Cardiology'}]}, 'sponsorCollaboratorsModule': {'leadSponsor': {'name': 'Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz', 'class': 'OTHER'}, 'responsibleParty': {'type': 'PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR', 'investigatorTitle': 'Thomas Rostock, MD', 'investigatorFullName': 'Thomas Rostock', 'investigatorAffiliation': 'Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz'}}}}