Ignite Creation Date:
2026-03-26 @ 3:19 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-05-04 @ 11:17 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT07468760
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2026-03-13
First Post:
2026-03-09
Is Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Peri-Implant Hard and Soft Tissue Changes After Immediate Implant Placement With Socket Shield and Immediate Restoration Versus Early Implant Placement in the Esthetic Zone
Sponsor:
Gulf Medical University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Evaluation of Peri-implant Hard And Soft Tissues Changes Between Immediate Implant Placement With Socket Shield Technique and Immediate Restoration Versus Early Type II Implant Placement in The Esthetic Zone - A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2026-03
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to compare peri-implant hard and soft tissue dimensional changes following immediate implant placement with the socket shield technique and immediate restoration versus early type II implant placement with contour graft in the esthetic zone. The primary outcome is the Pink Esthetic Score (PES), while secondary outcomes include mid-facial mucosal recession, radiographic vertical and horizontal buccal bone remodeling, and patient satisfaction after 12 months.
Detailed Description:
Immediate implant placement is widely used for replacing non-restorable teeth in the esthetic zone. However, post-extraction remodeling of the buccal bone plate can lead to soft tissue recession and compromised esthetic outcomes. The socket shield technique has been proposed as a partial extraction therapy designed to preserve the buccal root fragment and maintain the facial bone and gingival architecture.
This single-center, prospective randomized controlled clinical trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the socket shield technique with immediate implant placement and immediate restoration compared with early type II implant placement with contour augmentation.
Forty-two patients requiring extraction of a single non-restorable tooth in the esthetic zone will be randomly allocated into two groups:
Test group: Immediate implant placement with socket shield technique and immediate restoration.
Control group: Early implant placement following soft tissue healing with contour augmentation.
Clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes will be assessed over a 12-month follow-up period.
This single-center, prospective randomized controlled clinical trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the socket shield technique with immediate implant placement and immediate restoration compared with early type II implant placement with contour augmentation.
Forty-two patients requiring extraction of a single non-restorable tooth in the esthetic zone will be randomly allocated into two groups:
Test group: Immediate implant placement with socket shield technique and immediate restoration.
Control group: Early implant placement following soft tissue healing with contour augmentation.
Clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes will be assessed over a 12-month follow-up period.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
Secondary ID Infos
| Secondary ID | Type | Domain | Link | View |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IRB-COD-STD-87-Feb-2025 | OTHER | Gulf Medical University | View |