Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 1:36 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-06-06 @ 7:19 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT07057895
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2025-07-10
First Post:
2025-07-01
Is Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Diagnostic Consistency of GLIM and PG-SGA for Malnutrition in Pancreatic Cancer
Sponsor:
The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Diagnostic Consistency of the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) Criteria and the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) for Malnutrition in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2025-07
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic consistency between the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria and the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) for identifying malnutrition in patients with pancreatic malignant tumors. The goal is to determine if the GLIM criteria, a newer and more streamlined tool, shows substantial agreement with the well-established PG-SGA, thereby supporting its use in this high-risk clinical population.
Detailed Description:
Pancreatic cancer is a highly aggressive malignancy often associated with severe nutritional decline. While the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002) is used for initial screening and the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) is a recognized standard for detailed nutritional assessment, the PG-SGA can be time-consuming. The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria were developed to provide a globally harmonized, two-step framework for diagnosing malnutrition. This prospective observational study was designed to compare the performance of GLIM criteria against the PG-SGA in patients with pancreatic cancer. Patients admitted to the hospital were screened with NRS 2002. Those at nutritional risk (NRS 2002 ≥ 3) were then comprehensively assessed using both PG-SGA and GLIM criteria. The study hypothesis is that the GLIM criteria and PG-SGA will demonstrate good consistency in diagnosing malnutrition in this population, validating GLIM as a practical and reliable assessment tool in clinical settings.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: